Mark your calendars! The Annual Conference of the Parental Defense Alliance of Utah will be on
April 28-29, 2016
PROPOSED ENHANCEMENTS TO THE CARE E-FILING SYSTEM
1. Rather that simply search by the name of the child, it would be helpful for parental defense attorneys to be able to search by parent name.
2. When adding difference cases/children to a particular filing, it would be helpful to have a check box available, rather than adding them manually.
3. It would be helpful if the contact information for counsel and state workers were available in the system, such as GALs, AGs or caseworkers.
4. On the search page it would be helpful to be able to change the default from A-A to A-Z.
5. On the MyCalendar page, it would be helpful to be able to search for a date range rather than just look at one day at a time.
6. A file repository in the system would be helpful, particularly when there are multiple users in a firm.Thanks to all who attended and especially the court staff--Katie Gregory, Krista Airam, and Brody Aristita-- for coming!
Region
Name
|
Judicial
Districts
|
Current
Board Member Representative
|
Northern
|
1 and 2
|
Carol Mortensen
|
Salt Lake
|
3
|
Jim
Smith
|
Central
|
4
|
Grant Dickinson
|
Southern
|
5
and 6
|
David
Boyer
|
Eastern
|
7 and 8
|
Mark Tanner
|
I wondered if you would consider putting this tale on the blog, because I love this story, a true story about one of our best and brightest, Julie George.
Julie was called in to do a shelter hearing, and was representing alleged Dad. Tiny infant, subject of the case, was being clutched tightly by foster mom who almost had a death grip on the adorable little bambino. Incarcerated Mom, through counsel, indicated that she was prepared to swear that Julie's client was in fact father. Alleged father asserted he was willing to swear the same. A request was made the Court adjudicate paternity immediately. The Guardian objected. She wanted DNA testing. The mom could just "say" that Julie's client was Dad, and he might not be biological father at all.
The Court inquired, "well yes, but that's usually the case, what with Moms being in the best position to name Dads. And besides, aren't men married to the Mom presumed to be legal father, irrespective of any notions of genetics?" The Guardian persisted that if the Court adjudicated on their say-so alone, that man may weasel his way into the litigation, into the child's life, and that shouldn't be.
Then she argued that guy didn't even have a right to court appointed counsel (which Julie was at the time) unless and until he established legal paternity. (The old catch-22. You can't have counsel until you establish legal paternity, and you can't establish legal paternity without counsel because you don't know what you're doing...)
Without missing a beat, Julie stood up and said the alleged father just handed her a nickel, she considered that a "retainer agreement," and she was working for him for that nickel until paternity was established. Then, she launched in the the smoothest, slickest argument about the State's efforts to vex the man in establishing paternity long enough to then turn around and argue that the child was bonded with the foster parents to the degree the child should not be moved.
Held by the Court: Paternity established. DCFS has 48 hours to walk through Dad's house, and absent demonstrable safety concern, infant to be placed with Dad. She earned just a bit over 3 cents an hour for that argument, and my undying admiration. When frustrated, tired and lost in our efforts to open a can of whoop-ass on the powers that be, we should all ask, "WWJ(Julie)D?"
Individualized treatment. Individuals with disabilities must be treated on a case-by-case basis consistent with facts and objective evidence. Persons with disabilities may not be treated on the bases of generalizations or stereotypes. For example, prohibited treatment would include the removal of a child from a parent with a disability based on the stereotypical belief, unsupported by an individual assessment, that people with disabilities are unable to safely parent their children. Another example would be denying a person with a disability the opportunity to become a foster or adoptive parent based on stereotypical beliefs about how the disability may affect the individual's ability to provide appropriate care for a child.
Full and equal opportunity. Individuals with disabilities must be provided opportunities to benefit from or participate in child welfare programs, services, and activities that are equal to those extended to individuals without disabilities. This principle can require the provision of aids, benefits, and services different from those provided to other parents and prospective parents where necessary to ensure an equal opportunity to obtain the same result or gain the same benefit, such as family reunification.
Region
Name
|
Judicial
Districts
|
Current
Board Member Representative
|
Northern
|
1 and 2
|
Carol Mortensen
|
Salt Lake
|
3
|
David
Boyer
|
Central
|
4
|
Grant Dickinson
|
Southern
|
5
and 6
|
Open
|
Eastern
|
7 and 8
|
Open
|
PDA members/attorneys may find this ADA research and pleadings helpful in their own child welfare cases throughout Utah Juvenile Courts. Although we raised the ADA or disability issues at permanency and termination proceedings, the ADA should be raised by parental defense counsel as early as possible in the case such at disposition, at the beginning of the reunification services portion of the case, or if services are being modified then somewhere in the middle of the reunification services portion of the case.